Life After Death - Dualism, Monism and Materialism

Many of us have some view or idea of the afterlife – whether it is some kind of utopia or even if there is one at all. Research conducted by Douglas Davies found that around 29% of us believe that nothing happens after death, 8% think that our bodies awaits resurrection and 12% believe that we will come back as someone else. Of course there are some more religious people, 22%, who just think that we should trust in God, the remaining 34% of us believe that our souls passes on to another world. These views can all be classed into the traditional divide used when discussing the soul and life after death. There is the Monist view – the idea that the body and the soul exists as a single unity, the souls existence is dependent on the body,†¦show more content†¦Dawkins taught that we survive death both memetically and genetically. We pass our genes onto the next generation; the body is merely a survival machine for our genes. Through the minds of others we are able t o survive death through their memories of us. Ennius wrote ‘for I shall live, as I pass to and fro through the mouths of men’. Hick developed the ‘Alternative Materialistic’ view. This provides an alternative interpretation of resurrection. Hick put forward the idea of ‘psycho-somatic unity’, the body and soul are one but we are made of matter and it cannot be separated. Resurrection occurs ‘in another space of an exact psycho-physical replica of the deceased person’. This is the idea that a physical you as an individual being can continue to exist after death. Hick uses the example of a person travelling from London to New York, for the person to be recognisable, their physical appearance and character must be recognisable for the person greeting them in New York. There are many different views regarding the soul and its existence. Many of these views are conflicting and have manyShow MoreRelatedRealism : Reality And Dualism1340 Words   |  6 PagesReality is Dualism There are currently four major theories about the nature of reality and substance— materialism/physicalism, idealism, transcendental idealism, and dualism. Materialism is the theory that there is only the physical and material world. Idealism takes the position that reality is made up of ideas and immaterial. Transcendental idealism holds the idea that our experience of things are shaped by how they appear to us and not by what they are in and of themselves. Both materialism and idealismRead MoreEco-Buddhism7194 Words   |  29 Pages  [  On a physical level too, cancer, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory and auto-immune disease as well as diverse ‘functional illnesses’ have become epidemic.  [  What will our governments, corporations and politicians now do with the power of life or death over the biosphere from which our species evolved? Do politicians even understand the scientific facts? Are they as attentive to their citizens and future human generations as they are to the most profitable corporate special interest in commercial

Gay adoptions is a very controversial topic - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 650 Downloads: 8 Date added: 2019/07/30 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Gay Adoption Essay Did you like this example? Today there are about 153 million kids in orphanages worldwide. With a number that high, we shouldnt hold people back from providing these kids with a home, a family, and an education. You hear so many people say, They are the future, but the same people who say that, arent doing everything they possibly can to help the kids find homes. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Gay adoptions is a very controversial topic" essay for you Create order Even though all of the 50 states allow gay adoptions, in order for them to adopt it can only be joint adoptions. While Gay Marriage alone is a very controversial topic, gay adoption is more controversial because people believe that a family should consist a mother and a father. One argument that people have about gay adoption is that the kids are not being put into a traditional family. They believe that every child should have a mother and a father. I can understand when people say that a child needs a mother and a father in their lives. A mother can teach her child things that a father could never teach, or that a father can teach his child things that a mother could never. But is that a reason to deny a child a family? Is a child better off in an orphanage system, rather than being in a non traditional family? Another argument is about how the the child of a gay couple would be treated by their peers. We have to work on acceptance, instead of working on ways to prevent gays to adopt. Besides the questions of gay couples fitness for parenthood, there is the issue of how the children of such parents would be treated by their peers In this day and age we have to work on acceptance, instead of working on ways to prevent gays to adopt. While it has commonly been used as an argument against gay and lesbian adoption, studies have shown that same-sex adoption does not have a negative impact on children The studies arent saying that the kids and their families wont still face prejudice and discrimination from people in their communities, it just says that it wont impact them to much. The families will still continue to make a living while battling all it. People who believe that gay adoptions should be legal will say, that same-sex adoptions are needed because there are so many children waiting to be adopted and same-sex couples are able to provide the children with stable homes and families. Kids who are in the orphanage just want a home, and a family. As a parent if you can provide the kids with food, shelter and clothings, it shouldnt matter whether there is a mom and a dad. Our number one worry should be to provide the kids with a stable home, and a great family that they can call their own. So many kids spend their whole life in an orphanage system, and they simply age out of the system when they turn 18, without a family and without the skills to make it on their own. In 2016 over 17,000 kids aged out of foster care. They also will never have a home that they could come back to. They never had someone who could guide them, teach them the skills they need to survive out in the world, because others are denying gays to adopt. I dont believe that a gender of a parent would affect the kind of shelter, food, or clothing that they would provide for the child. No one should deny someone love, or family based on the gender. Love is love, and every child deserves that in their life, no one should ever grow up without a family of their own. They are all alone, because people who have never been in their shoes believe that every child needs a traditional family. That kids are better off in the system rather than being in a home with a gay parent.

Comparison Between Wind and Other Poem Free Essays

Compare how Wind and one other poem present weakness and strength. The weaknesses and strengths in ‘Wind’ are attempts to portray the diversity of nature and the ongoing sense that nature has by using the present tense. Hughes switches from hard sounds, ‘bang and vanish with a flap’ and ‘black back gull bent like an iron bar’ representing the hard assonance and from this referring back to the harsh storm. We will write a custom essay sample on Comparison Between Wind and Other Poem or any similar topic only for you Order Now However the use of colour in descriptions could symbolize both a negative and a positive, for example, ‘orange sky’ representing the warm colours of summer, also ‘green goblet’ could seem to be related to jealousy however could also be referred to as bright and a symbolic image of summer and the bright colours, linking to the ‘orange sky’. The diversity in ‘below the green corrie’ in terms of portraying weakness and strengths are highlighted through the man and his relationship with nature, it shows the weakness of the writer in terms of competing with nature. In my opinion I believe that not only the writer portrays himself to be the weaker opposition but also can portray the ‘bandit’ like and the ‘swashbuckling’ mountains to eventually be seen as the weaker opponent to another side of nature. For example, ‘a sunshaft had pierced the clouds and their leader’ could represent the light controlling the intimidating mountains and almost converting it to something more hopeful and positive. This could be the sun, the main character in nature, controlling them without choice, this takes away the sense of fear and the negativity of the ‘bandits’ and creates a positive image. Both ‘Wind’ and ‘Below the Green Corrie’ clearly share the same structure in terms of the negative openings to each poem. They both clearly and dynamically highlight the dangerousness of the situations automatically. MacCaig begins with a negative image of ‘the mountains gathered round me like bandits’ which really presents the fearful situation. In contrast to this ‘Wind’ also presents this. Hughes immediately beings with a metaphor, ‘This house has been far out at sea all night’ comparing the house to a boat, ‘at sea’ (isolated), this really emphasises the danger. They both begin presenting their negative images, those that seem to place both in a vulnerable position. ’ The mountains gathered round me’ show the vulnerability of the character, contrasting that ‘this house has been far out at sea’ also shows this, the use of ‘at sea’ creates an image of isolation, placing the so called house in a vulnerable position also. How to cite Comparison Between Wind and Other Poem, Essay examples